space Home space
space Contact Kevin space
space Availability space
space Great Mind Award space
space Hall of Fame space
space Personal Interests space
space Shocking Truths space
space Best Practices Test space
space Curriculum Vitae space
space Brand Death Watch space
space Case Histories space
space CEO / CMO Exam space
space Webcasts space
space Marketing Blog space
space Copernicus space
Kevin J Clancy - Marketing Consultant
spc_image spc_image
Hall of Fame

Too Much Talk About Brand Juice and Not Enough About Brand Transformation

Talk about spin.  A new digital agency asked us about “brand juice.”  They wanted help in creating more brand juice for their clients.  They wanted us to create a research model—a “juice blender”—that they could offer to all of their clients.  “What in heaven’s name are you talking about?”  We asked, chuckling.  This brandspeak sounded so nutty. They went on to talk reverentially about brand personality, brand emotions, brand essence, brand promise, brand values, brand voice, and even the brand statement.

We were intrigued. Some of this is good stuff, even important stuff, and we sometimes talk about it when we give a speech on positioning and advertising.  But much of it is new economy jargon and ad agency mumbo-jumbo that masks the fundamental problem.  In many cases the brand has no reason for being.  It solves no buyer’s problem.  It is, and perhaps should remain, a commodity.

Listening to incoherent brandspeak, one might think that all you need to do is take a brand, product, service, maybe even an entire company, and dip it in brand juice.  And voila!  Something happens!  You’ve transformed a nothing, through brand dip alone, into a powerful presence.

Brand juicers must be kidding.  If you want to build a powerful brand, figure out who the target is and everything about them.  Uncover their motivations, their problems, their pains.  And then configure your product or service or company so that it addresses the target’s motivations, solves their problems, alleviates their pain.  Finally, unleash the power of communications to tell people, with words and pictures, why and how you do this better than anyone else in the industry.

This recommendation is particularly pertinent to the new proponents of speed branding.  The phrase means building a brand in record time, maybe even two months, as dot-com company after dot-com company has been going over the cliff in the past decade. Some entrepeneurs have convinced themselves that the normal processes of building awareness, converting awareness to interest and interest to trial, trial into repeat usage and spending could be accelerated  beyond anything anyone had ever thought possible through extraordinary levels of advertising expenditures.

Many would argue that great brands and successful businesses, like fine wine, require aging.  We don’t necessarily share this view; we believe it is theoretically possible to build a brand quickly—albeit not in two or three months—but only if the business fundamentals have been mastered.

When you’re done, you’ve got a brand.  You have something remarkable that people are willing to pay a premium for and go out of their way to find.  You have something that stands out from the crowd and represents timeless value.

We told this to the digital agency and its senior staff and begged them to stop talking gibberish and get back to fundamentals:  target, motivations, product solutions, positioning, communications.  Brand essence, values and personality, and the like are “nice-to-haves,” but they’re not essential to brand success.  The fundamentals are.



Shocking Truths:

> There's a Negative Relationship Between What People Say They Will Do and What They Actually Do
> Quality and Price Are Positively, Linearly Related
> As Price Goes Up, Sales Go Down
> New Product Appeal and Profitability Are Not Positively Related
> Jobs-Based Segmentation Is Not a Remedy to Marketing Malpractice
> Most Brands Are Unpositioned
> Higher Levels of Customer Satisfaction and Retention Don't Always Translate Into Higher Profitability
> Net Promoter Scores Suggest That Most Companies Employ a Failed Business Strategy
> Back To The Future: How a Discredited Research Tool Discarded in the 1960s Has Become Popular in 2012
> Spending Money to Build an Emotional Connection with Your Brand Won't Build Market Share
> Most Companies Are Operating without a Vision
> Derived Importance Measures Will Lead You to the Wrong Decision
> Focus Groups May Kill Your Brand
> The Maximum Difference Methodology: a Questionable Solution in Search of a Problem
> Heavy Buyers are the Worst Target for Most Marketing Programs
> CEOs Don't Know Much About Marketing
> Advertising ROI is Negative
> Many CEOs Never Take The Time To Do It Right
> Given lots of cues and prompts, few people remember anything about your television commercial the day after they watched it
> A Dumb Way To Buy Media Is Based On The Cost Per Thousand People Exposed—CPMs
> Implementation May Be More Important Than Strategy
> Zip Codes Tell You Little About Consumers And Their Buying Behavior
> Retailers Rarely Send Truly Personalized Mailings to Individual Customers
> Too Much Talk About Brand Juice
> Marketing Plans are more Hoax than Science